Failure: The Leadership Litmus Test
The Leaders Who Still Don’t Get It
We’ve all seen it—the moment something goes wrong, a missed deadline, a bad decision, a failed initiative, and leadership’s knee-jerk reaction is to come down hard on someone. Maybe it’s a public takedown in a meeting. Maybe it’s an email chain with layers of blame. Maybe it’s a performance review where failure is dressed up as “missed expectations.”
I’ve been there. I’ve watched leaders turn failure into a weapon instead of a lesson. And I’ve also seen the ones who handle it the right way—the rare ones who use failure as a leadership moment, not an excuse to flex authority.
Here’s the truth: Failure isn’t the problem. How we respond to it is.
Failure: The Cost of Playing the Game
If you think you can innovate, move fast, or build something meaningful without failure, you’re in the wrong business.
Thomas Edison failed 10,000 times before inventing the light bulb.
Elon Musk has had SpaceX rockets explode more times than most people launch PowerPoints.
Jeff Bezos has lost billions on failed Amazon ventures—yet Amazon dominates because they don’t stop taking shots.
These people don’t just tolerate failure—they expect it. Because they understand that failure isn’t the opposite of success—it’s the cost of playing the game.
Yet, somehow, many corporate leaders still treat failure like a crime. They talk about “failing forward” and “learning from mistakes,” but the moment a team stumbles, it’s blame, escalation, and postmortems filled with career-limiting landmines.
I’ve seen leaders crush a team’s morale over a missed deadline instead of asking, “What did we learn?” I’ve seen people get fired for taking calculated risks while the ones who played it safe were rewarded with promotions.
This isn’t leadership. This is fear-based management.
The Fear of Failure Creates a Culture of Stagnation
When failure is punished, people stop taking risks.
When failure is shamed, people hide mistakes.
When failure is a career death sentence, companies stop innovating.
It’s why so many large organizations move like glorified risk-avoidance machines instead of fast-moving product engines.
I was at a company where we introduced “Friday Failures”—a meeting where teams openly shared what went wrong that week and what they learned. No judgment. No blame. Just reflection, discussion, and growth.
What happened?
✅ People became more transparent about risks and challenges.
✅ Teams started solving problems faster instead of covering them up.
✅ Innovation skyrocketed because people weren’t afraid to try new things.
That’s what a real culture of learning looks like.
The Leaders Who Handle Failure Well
A real leader doesn’t just tolerate failure—they navigate people through it.
When something goes wrong, they don’t say, “Who screwed this up?” They ask:
➡️ “What did we learn?”
➡️ “How do we adjust?”
➡️ “What can we do differently next time?”
They protect their teams from destructive, knee-jerk reactions from higher-ups. They own the failure with their people instead of throwing them under the bus.
These leaders create a space where teams feel safe to try, fail, and try again—because they know that’s where real success comes from.
Final Thought: The Only True Failure Is Avoiding Failure
If you’re in a leadership position and you’re still punishing failure, you are the bottleneck.
If your teams fear taking risks, it’s because you made it unsafe to fail.
If your people hide mistakes, it’s because you made mistakes punishable.
If your organization moves too slowly, it’s because you built a system where nobody dares to try something new.
You don’t need another motivational poster about “Failing Forward.” You need to actually build a culture where failure is recognized for what it is—a necessary step toward success.
Because here’s the truth:
🚨 The teams that fail fast, learn, and adapt will always outpace the ones that play it safe.
The question is—which one are you leading?
#failure #leadership #mikefisherinc #agility #agile #productmanagement #productdevelopment